Changing Times - Ann Jones in Liberia
Posted by Ann Jones on 28 January, 2008
![]() Men feel free to assault women in public, with complete impunity. A Global Crescendo photographer caught this man beating his pregnant wife. The man in the background looking on appears to be laughing. Photo: Kebeh Jallah |
| The International Rescue Committee is working with women’s advocate Ann Jones to help women in war zones — survivors of conflict, displacement and sexual and domestic violence — use photography to make their voices heard. Ann is blogging the year-long project from West Africa. If you’re just joining us, you can read her first series of posts from Cote d’Ivoire here.
The story continues in Liberia, where Ann is posting updates and photos on Mondays and Thursdays into February. Voinjama, Liberia I board an IRC vehicle and catch a colleague, a Liberian man, in the middle of a story about his escape from Lofa County during the Charles Taylor war. “So we got over the border, and we’re standing in the street, and a Guinea man steps on this Liberian lady’s foot.” The other Liberian men in the car laugh in anticipation. They can see trouble coming. “So this Guinea man stands there. He don’t know he’s standing on the Liberian lady’s foot. So this lady tries to get her foot out from under the man’s boot, and she gives him a little bitty shove. To call his attention to her foot, which is in a sorry condition.” “Oh oh!” says a listener, laughing. “So this Guinea man turns around and smashes her in the face—Boom!—like that, with his fist, and she falls down, and the blood comes spouting out her nose. So then we all fight, and then the police come, and they was going to arrest us, but finally they let us go. They said we was Liberians and didn’t know better than to fight.” “Hee, hee, hee!” This story, which seems so hilarious to Liberian men, has nothing really to do with the Liberian lady or her sorry foot. This is a story about Liberian men whose default response to any problem is violence—men who know that about themselves and laugh about it. I’ve already told you about the entrepreneurial women of Logantown Women’s Development Association, doing business—selling fried cookies or water or peanuts—so their husbands won’t beat them for being “idle.” (See Posting #5) Some Logantown members, including Patience, the photographer, say that since they went into business their husbands have changed; they don’t beat them anymore, now that they’re making money. But other women who work just as hard, sell just as much stuff, and make just as much money say their husbands beat them just the same. Somebody says maybe women’s “idleness” is not the cause of violence after all. Many women say men beat women because women are uneducated. Men have to beat women to get them to do what’s “right.” This, of course, is how men explain it. ![]() At a village women’s center, women taking an evening literacy class work by the light of kerosene lamps. Photo: Kebeh Jallah It’s one reason women want education: to relieve men of the duty of beating them. Annie, a photographer from Voinjama, says that she enrolled in a literacy course for this reason, but every day her husband ripped the latest exercise from her notebook and used it as toilet paper. Kebeh, a photographer from Dougoumai, says that when she disobeyed her husband’s order to give up her literacy class, he got out his gun—there are plenty left over from the wars—and tried to kill her. Annie and Kebeh reach the same conclusion. Kebeh says, “He doesn’t want me to be educated.” Annie says, “He’d rather hit me.” At a meeting in Chocolate City, Montserrado County, a sharp old woman named Sarah The only traditional recourse a woman has, besides “giving up” is to ask a close male relative to convene a family meeting to settle her complaint. The husband can then invite his family to back him up. Most of these family adjudications—or “home settlements”— find fault in the woman and advise her to change her behavior. Some require the husband to apologize—and the wife to accept the apology. By tradition, that’s the worst thing that can happen to a man who beats his wife. He might have to say, “Sorry.” ![]() Even making money, like this successful fish saleswoman in the Voinjama market, may be no protection from a husband’s violence. Photo: Krubor Zeyzey Now, under new family laws, a woman can report a battering husband to police or to the court. What happens then varies from place to place. In Dougoumai, women tell me the police won’t take a wife beater to court unless the woman is badly injured or at least bleeding. Then the court might send the case back to the family for “home settlement.” Or the magistrate might offer to hear the case in exchange for the sexual services of the bleeding wife. He’s notorious for it. The Women’s Action Group of Dougoumai wrote a letter to their senator, asking that the corrupt magistrate be replaced. If the senator doesn’t answer soon, they plan to write to President Sirleaf herself. Agnes, the GBV social worker at Dougoumai says, “If a woman speaks up to her husband, the violence can start right there.” “Yeah,” says another woman. “They been doing it way too long.” |












1 February, 2008 at 12:22 am
It’s difficult to know how to get involved and help in these situations but understanding the problems is always a key first step. This blog does a great deal of explaining. Thanks, Ann Jones.
17 February, 2008 at 3:17 pm
Ann. Reading your column in the LA Times today. Very powerful.
Back in Sept, 2006, we were force fed, by the LA Times a disgusting revision of history, in the guise of creating a legacy for Kofi Annan and maintaining one for Bill Clinton (and they are worthy of some, to be sure) and for the purpose of casting blame for all that is bad on one George Bush. The full front page column was a Sunday graphically enhanced presentation of spin. Introduce James Traub of the NY Times:
“From 1997 through 2000, the world was largely at peace, none of the horrific civil wars in the Third World rose to genocidal proportions, and the White House was occupied by an internationalist Democrat. Then, in rapid succession, a unilaterally-minded Republican took office..one of Sudan’s interminable ethnic conflicts erupted into a scorched-earth war. The man who had won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2001 suddenly looked hapless, even pitiful…”
You see, there was no DR Congo civil war, no Sierra Leone, no Ivory Coast, etc.
On a regular basis, either thru e-mail or social events, Save Darfur comes up (big and popular here in the US as it serves as yet another anti-Bush vehicle. The large angry left in the US would not be involved in caring about Darfur, if not for Bush being in the WH. Heck, even renouned journalists like James Traub has the blessing on our major media to tell us that Africa was just fine in the late 90’s - and it was because of Clinton and Annan. I have yet to find a single civilian activist (including journalists busy writing about Darfur, etc.) that are aware of much else; to wit; the BBC has often reported about the civil war in the DR Congo - says that over 4 1/2 million have died, millions more displaced (and the war on women, of which you are so involved with)- it began in 1998, just after Pres, Clinton said, “Never Again.”
And hardly a soul here in the US knows aobut it.
Hardly a soul knows about the UN sex/rape scandal which came to official light a couple of years back, either.
My effort here is certainly not a critque of your work or column. It’s a plea to use your very powerful voice to encourage journalists, and others to report the news - no matter what.
I was looking for more information in your column about the entire DR conflict - and will look further. I wish you all the heartfelt blessings I can muster in your quest. Indeed it is honorable and just.
Thank you.